Gorgeous & Green!

Gorgeous & GreenDesign Ecology is a donor for this year’s Gala Dinner to benefit GLOBAL GREEN, at the invitation of EcoFabulous. The event is this Tuesday evening, December 8 and includes a Patron Dinner, VIP Lounge, Eco Fashion Show, live music, and Green Cocktails. In other words, a great party!

We are excited to participate and will be creating a luscious living wall of culinary and native plants at the ballroom entrance. It’s a great honor to be participating in this event at the W HOTEL, and if our California native hummingbird and butterfly wall is not enough to bring you out, maybe you’d like to hob-knob with esteemed attendees including Gavin & Jennifer Newsom, Jeremy Piven, Celebrity Iron Chef Mourad Lahlou, singer Matt Nathanson, actor Peter Mensah, and of course supermodels Angela Lindvall and Josie Maran.

We hope you’ll join us in supporting the great work Global Green is doing in New Orleans and around the world. Click here for tickets.

Design Ecology sponsors West Coast Green 2009

west_coast_green_logoproject_small1Design Ecology is proud to be a sponsor for the largest green conference on the west coast, to be held this year at Fort Mason on the San Francisco waterfront. Over 10,000 attendees are expected, including architects, designers, policy-makers and eco-heads from across the western US. Look for our garden and stage displays, and stop by our booth or the “landscape lounge” in the tradeshow, which will feature our partners providing materials and support for the show gardens.

Josiah has participated for the past three years and is pleased to be a featured speaker again this year, on the topic of integrated water management. In his usual entertaining fashion, he will disclose our systemically dysfunctional water infrastructure and talk about proposed solutions via ongoing projects that are addressing these issues at multiple scales. Expect compelling discussion on green roofs, living walls, graywater, rainwater harvesting, stormwater control, all in a context of habitat restoration, cultural change, and an optimistic future vision.

Presidio/Site/Sculpture

Damselfly Competition Image

Damselfly Competition Image

It was a great honor for Design Ecology to be invited by the For-Site Foundation to submit a proposal to display an ecological sculpture representing an animal native to San Francisco’s Presidio. While our entry was not selected as a finalist, we have no regrets giving it up to such luminaries as Ai WeiWei, Don Chadwick, and CEBRA, and look forward to their product.

For now, here’s our ‘Avid Dancer’ submittal, intended as a sculpture that is also habitat for this elegant damselfly. Damsel flies and dragonflies are voracious consumers of mosquitos at all stages of life, from the water dwelling nymph to the airborne creature we are all familiar with. We liked the idea of raising awareness about the fact that mosquito fish (Gambusa sp.) eat native frog and amphibian eggs in addition to mosquito larvae, thus disrupting the balance of local ecosystems and actually depleting naturally occuring mosquito predators. Placing a damselfly ‘nursery’ next to stowe lake would help control the mosquitos that are there, demonstrating that the creation of beneficial habitat is a better solution than trying to control negative habitat.

Our sculpture was to be created with a matrix of flexible new solar tile and film technology, running a pump during the sunniest parts of the day in order to recycle water in the fountain — signifying the synergy between passive modern technology and natural ecological health.

URBAN RE:VISION, DALLAS

MOOV/Atelier DataUrban Re:Vision has announced winners for a design competition for an urban block of Dallas. The program challenges competitors to create a zero net energy, mixed use development that will house and provide for about 900 people. Among the top 3 is the local firm of David Baker + Partners, with whom Design Ecology is currently working on 22 units for Habitat Humanity in Oakland. Entries by LITTLE and MOOV/ATELIER DATA also made the top list. A developer for the site is already in place and participated in the judging process, increasing the potential for realization of the project.

Re:Vision will be posting complete winning entries soon, and have some images up already: http://www.urbanrevision.com/ReVision-DALLAS-Results. It will be interesting to see how the difficult and leading edge environmental design and self-sufficient resource systems program is met with these projects — as well as to see whether they pursue a modern approach such as DB+P’s reflective glass moves or the more european gestaldt of the MOOV/Atelier Data submittal. 

In either case, it appears alternative energy, on-site food production, and vegetated architectural systems are in Dallas’ future downtown plan.

jrc

CASCADIA

Rooftop Vegetables at Noble Rot Restaurant, Portland

Rooftop Vegetables at Noble Rot Restaurant, Portland

Just when you worry that Green Building has gone to mainstream and is being compromised by excessive greenwashing and commercial interest, an event comes along to remind us all that there is great progress to be made, and great people pushing the envelope.

The annual Living Future Conference, hosted by the Cascadia chapter of the US Green Building Council was once again an enlightening, authentic, and frank look at Green Building. Cascadia encompasses a large region from Oregon, Washington, and BC all the way to Alaska. Cascadia has long been the progressive wing of the USGBC and this group of long-time ecologically focused engineers, designers, and professionals pulls no punches (nor does the self proclaimed “militant arm of the chapter,” the Emerging Green Builders). They also have a lot of fun.

It was inspiring to surface issues such as “how do we address the fact that a LEED Silver building can be greener than a LEED Platinum Building?” This is absolutely true, since any green features that exceed the required minimum do not result in additional points; the LEED system rewards diversity of green over being thorough. For example, using 100%of lumber from responsibly managed forests garners no more points than using 50%. It follows that there is no reward for exceeding the minimum compliance. It’s well understand why this is so, and arguably a good strategy, but there needs to be a mechanism whereby a building is recognized for going the extra distance.

I presented on the concept of “Resilience,” something Sim Van der Ryn and I have been discussing for over a year now and have done some preliminary writing about. In particular, we feel that Food & Water are critical issues that are not being addressed adequately. If we cannot find ways to create infrastructure around these fundamental needs for life, the near future cannot be viewed optimistically. Our current Food and Water delivery systems are far too dependent on energy and centralized supply chains that we all recognize as tenuous. The current 1500 miles an average morsel of American food travels is indefensible from a sustainability standpoint, and the fuel and water associated with industrial agriculture is not possible to continue.

To create resilience in these systems, they must be localized and connected to natural cycles and climates. This means disentangling the often questionable adjudications and political arrangements resulting in waste and misuse; indeed, rethinking some of the more dysfunctional institutions and industries delivering basic services throughout our society.

This may appear at face value to be radical thinking; in fact we are witnessing the failure of these institutions before our very eyes, and indeed they are being rethought in this moment. What we are proposing is broader thinking that will create lasting resilience rather than short-term fixes that amount to an attempt to shore up a clearly outdated approach that is only viable due to subsidies that fly in the face of a free market.

On the ground, the goals need to be localized stable economies based on regional infrastructures that can withstand failures in larger infrastructures and institutions that seem likely in our future. Contrary to some agrarian idealism, Resilience relies upon the most proven passive systems for water and agriculture optimized through synergy with the most current technology. Hydroponic and aquaponic (integrated aqualture and agriculture) rooftop greenhouses and integrated site water management systems that intelligently select from multiple water supplies including graywater, rainwater, and recycled wastewater.

Scratching the surface is all that can be done here, but there will be much more to come on the topic of Resilience, and in particular how passive ecological systems can produce resilient local infrastructure to ensure food and water are available to all as we charge headlong into an uncertain future with failing infrastructures and an ailing economy.

Ecological Urbanism, part I: Koolhaas Keynote at Harvard

Koolhaas tackles "Ecological Urbanism"I could not miss the Harvard Graduate School of Design’s official entrance into the arena of green design when I received an invitation to the recent conference on “Ecological Urbanism.” Late to the conversation, the GSD was not about to tiptoe in through the backdoor, instead coining a new term and challenging cities to address sustainability at scale. To tee it off, Rem Koolhaas was scheduled to deliver a keynote address, ushering in what could be a new era with Mohsen Mustafavi as Dean.

When an architect is as famous as Rem Koolhaas, it’s not difficult to be controversial — people try to make a controversy out of everything you say, and Sanford Kwinter certainly did his best to create one from thin air as he moderated a discussion between Homi Bhabha and Rem. Credit goes to Koolhaas for sidestepping both that challenge and Bhabha’s seemingly boundless sentimentality for his home city of Mumbai, India. I have no idea why Bhabha was on the bill giving what he called a “key footnote,” or why Kwinter had any part in a conference bearing the word “ecological,” but I did appreciate Koolhaas’ genuine attempts to address what he accurately refers to as a “serious topic” and keep the conversation on point amidst much resistance. It would have been nice to hear more Koolhaas at the Koolhaas keynote.

Certainly it is difficult to find a genuinely ecological “starchitect” and Koolhaas is no exception. His humble opening remarks to this effect were to some degree countered by a skillful, if not inspiring, account of how we got to 2009. I for one much appreciated Rem reminding us all that we are on the cutting edge of 2500 year old technology — after all in the days before engineers and utility grids, architects had to design buildings that actually performed well using passive systems to interact with the environment — I know, this sounds extreme — there also was no AutoCADD and no internet research!

Starting with the early passive architecture of Vetruvious, Rem reflected on how the Enlightenment and Modernism movements have resulted in architecture based on form at the expense of ecological integration and the role of engineering rather than design to achieve building performance. He went on to discuss his early exposure to Tropical Architecture principles, admittedly not a big influence but apparently something that has relevance now that building sustainability is a mainstream topic. I’m not sure there was any big revelation there, but this simple history is itself a revolutionary topic of discussion at the GSD.

In a sense, Rem has done just what the Harvard GSD has done — entered into the conversation on green with a philosophical reference point that positions itself to be an innovator in an area it has turned it’s back on prior. I am not one to lament participation by anyone in this important movement, less so the leading edge of mainstream architecture! Nevertheless, the conference was contextually challenged by a focus on making cities “less bad” along with the sense of an institution grappling with its own historical disdain for the prioritization of an environmental agenda. It will be interesting to see if the GSD can make that turn fast enough to  be relevant to a rapidly advancing agenda for healthy ecological cities. 


Water uses Energy uses Water

There has been much talk lately about the relationship between water and energy, and it warms our hearts here at Design Ecology to see some recognition of the ways properly managing water can save energy. As it turns out, enormous amounts of energy are used to supply all of the water use, and enormous amounts of water are required to generate the power used to pump all of that water.

Read more…

Re:Vision San Francisco

Design Ecology is looking forward to participating in this week’s Urban Re:Vision Charette in concert with Mayor Gavin Newsome’s office and a hand-selected group of design experts led by the Urban RE:Vision team.

Together, we will be taking the first steps toward creating a revitalization plan for San Francisco’s Civic Center district, with a focus on ecological design solutions and urban sustainability. Gavin wants to transform our Civic Center into a “Global Model for how to achieve a more sustainable future in urban environments.” Sounds good!

Read more…

Gray Areas Around Graywater

As California government and the public grapple with the implications of SB1258, intended to enable graywater permits to occur more readily, the waters are not necessarily clearing. Advocates are asking for a policy that would allow most residential users to direct graywater to planting areas with little or no oversight. This runs in direct contravention to concerns of Plumbing and Environmental Health Services staff, who fear unrestrained use of graywater will lead to health & human safety concerns.

The Soap & Detergent industry has released results of a poll (100,000 Californians) indicating that there are 1.7 Million graywater systems in California, only 200 of which have permits. This underscores the dramatic shortcomings of a code that has, on paper, allowed the use of legal graywater since 1992.

Read more…

Green Cities

I am happy to be speaking at the Green Cities Florida conference in May (see link on home page) on the topic of “vegetated water management on site and structure.” Increasingly, I am convinced that vegetation is the key to a “green” city for more reasons than color, and that water management is inextricably linked. How is vegetation more important than, say, energy or health care? Let’s take a quick look at the role of vegetated systems.

Read more…